Got Trouble with Hair Loss? Buy Finasteride 1mg for Sale

Hair loss in men sometimes leads to baldness.  If you happen to see a bald man who seems to have lost their hair instead of having their head shaved bald, then they have male pattern baldness.  Male pattern baldness is actually a genetic condition that you inherit from your parents.  If you are a male and have older brothers or a dad who suffers from this hair loss condition, it is likely that you too will have inherited the condition and will soon suffer from it.  Normally, the condition of male pattern baldness can start as early as your late teens and will manifest by the time you reach your mid-twenties.

Although treatments are available for hair loss, they only manage to slow down the progression of the hair loss.  The true treatment for hair fall is called finasteride 1mg.  You can find finasteride 1mg for sale at your local pharmacy and you can also find finasteride 1mg for sale online.  The truth is that many buy their finasteride 1mg treatment online because they are able to get better savings by buying their hair fall meds on the internet.

In the past, there was really no effective treatment for hair loss aside from topical treatment that only attempt to slow down the progression of the genetic condition.  However, when Merck created the drug finasteride, everything about treating hair loss changed as the drug they actually made prevented the creation of the hormone that was responsible in the damaging and thinning of hair follicles which led to the thinning and dying of hair strands.  Although the discovery was accidental as finasteride was originally intended for another purpose, in the end, what they actually made was a very effective remedy for hair loss. Read more…

Does steel netting around bridges prevent suicide?



Maple Leaf Garden’s sex abuse victim Martin Kruze was but one of many to choose the Bloor Street Viaduct to end his life

When someone is determined to end his or her life, choosing to jump off a bridge is a pretty good bet. The impact of falling over 30 metres at about 120-129 kilometres an hour is akin to being hit by a speeding car.

To prevent the temptation by those overcome with despair and hopelessness, a barrier was constructed around Toronto’s Bloor Street Viaduct in 2003 – at a cost of 5½ million dollars. Known as the second most popular “suicide bridge” in the world (San Francisco’s Golden Gate ranks number one), some of the 400 people who’ve taken their lives there had travelled from afar to this particular bridge, since its construction in 1918.

City planners were anxious to know whether such a deterrent – dubbed the Luminous Veil – would work.

The verdict: “It works…,” says chief psychiatrist Anthony Levitt of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, “…at the Bloor Street Viaduct.” Indeed, suicide rates there dropped from an average of 9.3 to zero per year. Depressed individuals – mostly men in their mid-30s -- however, chose alternative bridges to end their lives since the Luminous Veil was constructed, making the annual rate of bridge jumping suicides almost unchanged. Dr. Levitt and resident doctor Mark Sinyor, part of the study team at Sunnybrook and the U of T (BMJ 2010;341:c2884) noted that since the barrier was erected bridge jumpers rose from 8.7 to 14.2 each year at other bridges. The researchers conclude that building physical barriers is only a part of the solution. “You need programs that improve access to psychiatrists and other mental health workers,” says Dr. Sinyor.

It seems abundantly clear that if millions of dollars are available to fight suicide, perhaps they could be better spent for mental health support, leaving artists like Bruce Cockburn to invent an alternate line for “You could have gone off the Bloor Street Viaduct” in his humorous song, “Anything Could Happen.”

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Editor: In 2002, with my late colleague Al Birney (deceased June 2006), I was the co-recipient of a Volunteer of the Year Award from the City of Toronto for our leadership of the Bloor Viaduct suicide-prevention campaign. While author Mark Sinyor's research has merits, I believe the present study is premature and suffers at least three serious oversights or shortcomings. (1.) It confines its focus to only nine years pre-barrier and merely four years post-barrier. Such a small statistical sample is inadequate to draw any unequivocal conclusions about the effectiveness of the barrier, especially given the 92-year history of the Viaduct. (2.) It makes no allowances for the overall population growth of Toronto. In this sense, I am heartened that "suicides by jumping" have flat-lined, while the city has continued to grow. (3.) The study makes no account of the suicide prevention value of eliminating the "copy cat" or secondary risk to witnesses and bystanders of suicides at a public place. People who are traumatized by witnessing a suicide are at much higher risk for later suicide attempts of their own. Prior to the barrier's construction, suicides at the Viaduct were witnessed by pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, police and students of the nearby high school. In truth, it will take another generation to gather enough information to accurately measure the life-saving potential of the "Luminous Veil," and to fully appreciate the legacy of Al Birney and the barrier's advocates. -- Michael McCamus, Vice-Chair, Bridge Committee, Schizophrenia Society of Ontario, Toronto.